🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.